I use primarily Nvidia GPU cards for rendering, some ML, Cuda projects etc – and occasionally run benchmarks on the cards l have on different workstations for comparison.
Using OctaneBench – click here to download – here are some results. I used OctaneBench 4.00c
GTX970 4GB Desktop PC 94.16
GTX1060 6GB – on Alienware 17R5 Laptop 91.31
GTX 1080 8GB – Desktop PC – 147.30
Seems a bit odd to me that a GTX1060 is beat by a GTX970, but that might be because of the mobile vs desktop version? , l am pretty sure l have ran other tests posted on this website showign a GTX1060 exceeding a GTX970
QuadQuadro M600M 2GB 21.23
This is a CPU only render test. Click here for the download source.
Recommended a minimum of 12 GB RAM
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Blender Foundation – gooseberry.blender.org
- Intel i7-2600K CPU@3.4Ghz 32Gb RAM Windows 10 GTX1080 8Gb
- Blender 2.79b
- Time: 1:38:20.61 1 hr 38mins
PC2 – A17R5:
- Intel i7-8760H CPU@2.20Ghz 16Gb GTX1060 6Gb Windows 10
- Blender 2.79b
- Time: 58 mins 58:34:08
using the latest [as of today] Blender: 2.8 beta, the CPU rendering engine time is greatly improved to: 34 minutes ! – an improvement of 24 mins !
Discovered this free but very good Benchmark software – Catzilla – Click here for the download website.
Here are my various PC results.
A17 laptop – GTX860M [4 years old]
PC with 2xGTX560Ti [recent build]
PC with GTX1080 8G + GTX970 4G [ 5 year old PC , i7 2600K at 3.4Ghz 32Gb ram with new Nvidia cards]
Got an unexpected ‘free’ speedbump from Comcast from 50Mbps to 60Mbps.
Ran a test before and after rebooting my modem, using Ookla Speedtest, and the before and after results are below.
Happy New Year 2018!
Benchmark results from my primary laptop/workstation.
Have this video card on my main CAD workstation (Q8200 2.33Ghz Quad-core 8Gb RAM Vista 64bit).
Updated the video driver to a nvidia 182.08 windows Vista 64 release after some windows vista problems with the 182.20 release. Seems to be working great.
Ran POV-RAY 3.6.1 Benchmark version 1.02
Render averaged 103.58 PPS over 147456 pixels, in a total time of 1423.63 seconds.
Boinc manager benchmark results:
2344 FP MIPS (whetstone) per CPU
6656 Integer MIPS (dhrystone) per CPU
My Workstation Cinebench R10 benchmark results: 5/15/2009
Intel Quad Q8200 64bit Vista Ultimate 8Gb DDR2
OpenGL = 2417, i CPU = 2641, Multi-CPU=8879
The HP xw8600 which uses the Xeon 5400 processor, has this specs 3888 (1 cpu) , 23,445 (multi-cpu) and 6571 for opengl
Wanted to take advantage of the CUDA from NVIDIA (a leading GPU manufacturer) – a system that uses GPUs for scientific computing. You also need a minimum of 256Mb Video card RAM to take advantage of CUDA. This will also increase my BOINC/SETI processing speed. My current nvidia driver for my PNY Quadro FX370 was dated 5/26/2008 release 220.127.116.1196. So l downloaded the latest driver from the nvidia website and the new driver is now dated 12/26/2008 release 18.104.22.16820
/this works okay on my Quad-core workstation and boosted my Vista index from 3.6 to 4.2
My Vista index ratings for my Processor/RAM/Hard drive was before and after the update 5.9
Graphics rating went from 3.6 to 4.2
Games graphics capability went from 4.0 to 4.6
It will be interesting to see this week what this GPU processing does to my boinc/seti ratings.
As of 2/26/2009
Total credit 80,793
Recent average credit 933.23
World Community Grid 774,268
Current workstation: Quad-core (Intel 8200), PNY Quadro FX370 video card, 8Gb, DDR2, Vista Ultimate 64, 1Tb SATA 3Gbps.
Polyray results: 103.3 PPS over 147456 pixels.
3dmark06: 1607 3dmarks, sms 2 =603,sms 3 = 521,cpu=3389