Blender

Blender Open Data

I’ve used several benchmark software to compare computer hardware especially nvidia GPU cards used for cuda programming.  One good free benchmark software is Maxon CineBench    , another is Unigine Haven

 

Here are surprising results generated from the new Blender Benchmark under its Blender Open data website program.

Quick summary/my findings:

  • less render time running Linux [LinumMint] than under Windows 10 [all things turned off], same hardware
  • SSD’s help

Linux run: Workstation with GTX1080 8Gb, GTX970 4Gb, 32Gb RAM, Quad core Intel processor. No SSD

Same hardware as above but run under Windows 10

Ran on same hardware, only using the GTX1080 8Gb , under Linuxmint – impressive resuly showing in my view and from cuda/nvidia research l did that the 4Gb of the 2nd graphics card limits the performance.

 

=======================================================

Home PC #2  Results below, newer PC, no SSD, 2 x GTX560Ti

Below results from Alienware 17 [4 years old] with Samsung Evo 500Gb SSD, GTX860M

Animation

NVIDIA CUDA 8 with LinuxMint

Notes, screenshots and results using, installing, testing Nvidia Cuda on Linuxmint 18.1

“CUDA is a parallel computing platform and programming model invented by NVIDIA. It enables dramatic increases in computing performance by harnessing the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU).

References:

Additional Notes:

sudo add-apt-repository ppa:maarten-baert/simplescreenrecorder
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install simplescreenrecorder

 

Tests done on my custom built Workstation PC as well as Alienware 17 laptop – all GPU specs below.

Quick comparisons [not the focus of this post]  :):

  • Puget systems laptop, with a GTX 980M 8Gb  – 91 billion int./sec, 1819 Gflops
  • My Alienware 17 with a GTX 860M 2Gb – 43.3 b.i.p.s, 866 Gflops
  • My workstation with a GTX 970 4Gb -> 146 b.i.p.s, 2919 GFlops.

Screenshots in no particular order.

 

Below result from Puget Systems test on their laptop, for comparison

Below my results

benchmark

Nvidia Quadro FX 370

Have this video card on my main CAD workstation (Q8200 2.33Ghz Quad-core 8Gb RAM Vista 64bit).
Updated the video driver to a nvidia 182.08 windows Vista 64 release after some windows vista problems with the 182.20 release. Seems to be working great.
Ran POV-RAY 3.6.1 Benchmark version 1.02
Results
Render averaged 103.58 PPS over 147456 pixels, in a total time of 1423.63 seconds.
Boinc manager benchmark results:
2344 FP MIPS (whetstone) per CPU
6656 Integer MIPS (dhrystone) per CPU
2-28-2009-11-27-34-pm

My Workstation Cinebench R10 benchmark results: 5/15/2009

Intel Quad Q8200 64bit Vista Ultimate 8Gb DDR2

OpenGL = 2417, i CPU = 2641, Multi-CPU=8879

The HP xw8600 which uses the Xeon 5400 processor, has this specs 3888 (1 cpu) , 23,445 (multi-cpu) and 6571 for opengl

5-14-2009-9-15-57-am

benchmark

Benchmark Results

Current workstation: Quad-core (Intel 8200), PNY Quadro FX370 video card, 8Gb, DDR2, Vista Ultimate 64, 1Tb SATA 3Gbps.

Polyray results: 103.3 PPS over 147456 pixels.

3dmark06:  1607 3dmarks, sms 2  =603,sms 3 = 521,cpu=3389